New Testimonials from Client who Beat their Traffic Tickets

/0 Comments/in , , , , , , /by

The following are some recently received client success stories and Testimonials:

“Dear Sirs, This is just to let you know how pleased I am to receive from the LA Superior Court, a note of dismissal of the above named ticket. They have forwarded today a check in the amount of $222.00 which I paid to the court. I am deeply grateful to you for your wonderful work. I am also impressed with your staff, Christina, and others who has been very positive from the beginning, and were very helpful to me. You really helped me greatly with this matter. More importantly I have become a more attentive driver now. Thank you very much again for your wonderful work. I am very fortunate to find your company. Blessings! Yours sincerely, Peter H C”

Video Testimonial found here

 http://www.youtube.com/user/TicketbustCA#p/a/u/2/5vTXjx1ZUPI

R.A. in California “TicketBust is AWESOME! Great service! The employees were super friendly and answered all of my questions. I have used them for multiple tickets and have always gotten them dismissed. My boyfriend referred me to them, he has also gotten a couple [of] tickets dismissed. Their service is fast and painless, I only had to do a couple of things and they handled the rest. Very happy with their services and will definitely use them again.”



Webisode #2: What To Do If You Get an LA Camera Ticket

/0 Comments/in , , /by



Webisode #2: What To Do If You Get an LA Camera Ticket, DON’T IGNORE THAT TICKET!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TicketbustCA#p/u/0/v09w63_fiew

Are Automated Traffic Enforcement Systems Speed Traps? Technically Yes!

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Are Automated Traffic Enforcement Systems Speed Traps? Technically Yes!, originally submitted to photoenforced.com blog by staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.

Red light camera systems are only supposed to record an incident that occurs during the red phase of the light, but ever wondered how the system is triggered?

A vehicle triggers the system by passing over a measured distance in the roadway (two sets of inductive loops are cut into the pavement). These sensors record the time it takes for the vehicle to cross the distance between the sensors and calculates the speed of the vehicle based upon the distance and the elapsed time for the vehicle to cross it. If the vehicle is over the set threshold then the system activates. Thus the calculated speed of the vehicle is used to trigger the camera (which records and stores information for use in later issuing a ticket for the prosecution of a red light violation).

California Vehicle Code defines a speed trap (in section 40802) as a section of a highway “measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance”. Speed traps are illegal in California.

So, red light camera system automated enforcement systems are technically illegal speed traps as defined in California law because of those sensors placed in the ground used to measure speed. Could this be a contributing factor to why class action lawsuits are finally being launched against major camera companies or why cities such as El Monte, Fresno, Moreno Valley, Union City and earlier this year, Costa Mesa, have shut down their camera systems?  –  blog submitted by staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets. 

If you get cited for a red light photo ticket, contact us at www.staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud or call us at (800) 850-8038.  For Spanish, please visit www.Combatesuticket.com or call (818) 584-3689.  For more information on how TicketBust can help to beat your cell phone ticket, visit www.fightcellphonetickets.com or call (800) 850-8038. 

Webisode #1: Introduction to TicketTalk, your source for traffic ticket information on the Web.

/0 Comments/in , /by

Webisode #1: Introduction to TicketTalk, your source for traffic ticket information on the Web.

http://www.youtube.com/user/TicketbustCA#p/u/1/fvrOrJahlHY

Certain Group of Drivers Able to Avoid Getting Nabbed for a Red Light Photo Ticket

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Approximately 30 years ago, the Confidential Records Program was started. Currently, CA law makes confidential license plates available to police officers and other state or government workers so certain workers can choose to keep their DMV info private, like their home address.

The law is supposed to keep certain information private like, the home address, to prevent say criminals from harassing, threatening, or stalking police officer’s, judges etc. This law has been expanded over the years to include numerous other Gov. or state worker positions (like park rangers) not just police officer’s or judges, and has even been extended to include spouses and children. Furthermore, employees can retain confidentiality for 3 years if they switch to a civilian job, and retired peace officers can remain in the confidential plate program indefinitely.

When someone in the privacy program is detected, the DMV can only release the person’s employing agency to non –police agencies and or to private companies that process citations for cities and counties. DMV cannot release a home address and therefore a violator with a confidential plate who is caught on camera can go unscathed whether they intend to or not.

There is no question that camera enforcement of traffic violations generates revenue for the state so if the DMV has a little more than one million vehicles registered to motorists which are connected to just a couple thousand state and local Gov. agencies which are of those allowed to opt for confidential plates, theoretically this so-called loop hole could prevent the state from collecting on millions of dollars from those state workers who are able to get around paying red light camera fines, tolls, or parking tickets. Assemblyman Jeff Miller has taken efforts in hopes to close the gap of this so called loop hole.-  blog submitted by staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets. 

If you get cited for a red light photo ticket, contact us at www.staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud or call us at (800) 850-8038.  For Spanish, please visit www.Combatesuticket.com or call (818) 584-3689.  For more information on how TicketBust can help to beat your cell phone ticket, visit www.fightcellphonetickets.com or call (800) 850-8038.

What the Blank Data Fields on Your Automated Traffic Enforcement Notice to Appear Mean to You

/0 Comments/in , , /by

-blog submitted to photoenforced.com by staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets. 

A red light camera ticket is mailed to you on a form (form  number TR-115) generally labeled Notice to Appear –Automated Traffic Enforcement and this form has data fields that are filled in with information like Name, Driver Lic. No., Age, Birth date, Yr. of Veh., Make, Color, Code and Section, etc. Sometimes many of these fields are not filled in and you may wonder why.

Well, some of the fields are mandatory and some are optional or discretionary (like the color of the vehicle pictured). The Judicial Council of California, Notice to Appear and Related Forms available here: http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/forms/documents/trinst.pdf

actually sets forth the mandatory fields which must appear and be filled in appropriately for the Notice to Appear to be considered genuine and valid.
Look to see if certain fields like your age and birth date are filled in or if the body style of your vehicle is filled in, if not, if these fields are left blank, then you might be able to get your ticket dropped on a technicality.-  blog submitted by staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.

If you get cited for a red light photo ticket, contact us at www.staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud or call us at (800) 850-8038.  For Spanish, please visit www.Combatesuticket.com or call (818) 584-3689.  For more information on how TicketBust can help to beat your cell phone ticket, visit www.fightcellphonetickets.com or call (800) 850-8038.

CA Legislature Intends to Allow Street-Sweeper Automated Enforcement Systems: Assembly Bill 2567

/0 Comments/in , /by

California Legislature Intends to Allow Street-Sweeper Automated Enforcement Systems: Assembly Bill 2567 blog submitted to PhotoEnforced blog by staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.

The intent of this Bill introduced by Assembly Member Bradford this year, is to allow a parking citation for street sweeping violation to be issued, much like a red light camera ticket.

The ticket would be mailed to the registered owner of any vehicle parked during designated hours of operation for a street-sweeping parking lane, supposedly unless the vehicle is parked after the street is cleaned (even if this is during the restricted hours).

Just like the law for red light camera tickets, there would be a required public announcement of the automated parking enforcement system, a required 30-day grace period where only warning notices are mailed, only a designated and qualified employee could review the photos and the photo evidence would be confidential and available only to public agencies to enforce parking violations, and the ticket would have to be mailed to the registered owner within 15 days of the violation date. Just like with red light camera tickets, the registered owner would be given the opportunity to fill out and send back an affidavit of non-liability.

The legislature’s reasoning is that street-sweepers collect excess pollutants from roads and streets like trash and chemicals which provides environmental and sanitation benefits which protects the environment and contributes to the general health of the people. According to an analysis by the District of Columbia Department of Public Works, a street-sweeper in a one mile range can remove approximately 10 pounds of oil and grease, pounds of nitrogen and phosphorus, and heavy metals. And the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works submitted a technical report in 2004 pushing for stricter enforcement of “no parking” regulations and street-sweeping to help prevent harmful pollutants from entering storm water drains.

Street-sweepers play an important role in society but is the legislature going too far in allowing for the installation of camera enforcement systems on street-sweepers? It seems there’s no end to what automated enforcement can be used for.- blog submitted by staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.

If you get cited for a red light photo ticket, contact us at https://www.staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud or call us at (800) 850-8038.

Case Study: One Questionable Stop at a Red Light could cost over $2,000!

/0 Comments/in , , , /by

Here is one client’s case:

Client was issued a ticket for a red light infraction while making a right hand turn.  The California Vehicle Code Section 21453 Circular Red or Red Arrow states:

21453.  (a) A driver facing a steady circular red signal alone shall stop at a marked limit line, but if none, before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection or, if none, then before entering the intersection, and shall remain stopped until an indication to proceed is shown, except as provided in subdivision (b).

(b) Except when a sign is in place prohibiting a turn, a driver, after stopping as required by subdivision (a), facing a steady circular red signal, may turn right, or turn left from a one-way street onto a one-way street. A driver making that turn shall yield the right-of-way to pedestrians lawfully within an adjacent crosswalk and to any vehicle that has approached or is approaching so closely as to constitute an immediate hazard to the driver, and shall continue to yield the right-of-way to that vehicle until the driver can proceed with reasonable safety.

(c) A driver facing a steady red arrow signal shall not enter the intersection to make the movement indicated by the arrow and, unless entering the intersection to make a movement permitted by another signal, shall stop at a clearly marked limit line, but if none, before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection, or if none, then before entering the intersection, and shall remain stopped until an indication permitting movement is shown.

(d) Unless otherwise directed by a pedestrian control signal as provided in Section 21456, a pedestrian facing a steady circular red or red arrow signal shall not enter the roadway.

Ticket Cost:  $200 plus court and administration fees

Insurance Premium:  $5,995* annual for a Standard Insurance Policy, a male driving 6 to 8 years in Los Angeles with one prior ticket.  This infraction carries one violation point on client’s record, which could increase the auto insurance premium by 30% or $1,798.

For all the details on how staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud saved this client over $2,000 this year, give us a call at 800 850-8038.

Another Very Happy staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud Customer

/0 Comments/in , , /by

At staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud there is nothing better than to receive word that a customer went out of their way to give us positive feedback. Here’s another example of why folks choose our ticket busting service for their traffic tickets…

R A.’s Review of: TicketBust
Greatttt (rating 5 out of 5)

TicketBust is AWESOME! Great service!  The employees were super friendly and answered all of my questions. I have used them for multiple tickets and have always gotten them dismissed. My boyfriend referred me to them, he has also gotten a couple [of] tickets dismissed. Their service is fast and painless, I only had to do a couple of things and they handled the rest. Very happy with their services and will definitely use them again.

Unsolicited Appreciation from More Clients

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by

Doug in Lake Havasu City “Hi Steve and all: Just got back from a little over 3 months away and found in my pile of mail a cheque drom the court in California for the return of my money. I was sceptical of your ability to have my ticket dismissed, as I had been caught “dead to rights.” I felt that a trial by written declaration would be a waste of time and money. I am so very glad that you folks proved me wrong and my 20 year clean driving record is still unblemished. Thanks again.”

Jim in California “In my entire life I have never before taken the time to endorse a product or service let alone recommend it to a friend, until now! On June 3, 2010 I was ticketed for speeding in Beverly Hills. I did not feel I was speeding, felt I was driving at the same pace as others and was surprised when the police officer pulled me over. He cited me for doing 46 mph in an area where he indicated the safe speed was 35mph.

In fact, he pointed out that the posted speed was 25mph. IN ADDITION, THE 46 MPH SPEED WAS CONFIRMED BY HIS LASER! I was fully prepared to pay the fine and accept the ticket until a friend of mine suggested I consider using Ticketbust (www.staging-vadusuxe.kinsta.cloud). I went on their website and was immediately impressed by the many testimonials).

Their advertisement is simple. “IF YOU WANT TO TRY TO GET YOUR TRAFFIC TICKET DISMISSED, THE PRACTICE USED BY TICKET BUST.COM IS ONE OF THE VERY BEST APPROACHES TO DISMISS YOUR TRAFFIC TICKET IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.”

Despite the appeal of the website, I still remained skeptical and actually took the time to visit thier office in Westlake Village. There fee was $229 (they offer a money back guarantee if they can’t beat the ticket) and involved my signing a “Trial By Written Declaration” form which they then complete and submit to the court. Their work on my behalf consited of a 3 page single spaced defense which was highly technical, methodical, very thorough and superbly written.

Yesterday, almost four months after the incident, I received the judges decision ruling in my favor, informing me that the case was dismissed and ordering the court to refund my $211 bail.

To those of you who feel you may have been given a ticket unfairly, you should consider using this service. “